The Daily Mail is Stupid

dailymail.jpgAnd in other news, the sky is blue.

Continuing their ongoing crusade against intelligence, the Daily Mail’s response to the Byron report again proves that you don’t need to know what you’re talking to talk about it. Hhhm, that sounds like it would make a good slogan for the paper. Between articles about how immigrant pedophiles are stealing all our jobs, they tasked Anne Diamond, TV presenter and mother of four to play some violent video games as an excuse to scare us all a bit more.

The article opens, “Computer games will carry cinema-style age ratings to protect children from violent and sexual images, ministers said yesterday.” Now, correct me if I’m wrong, I only have actually, I don’t know, READ the bloody report, but games that require children to be protected from due to violent and sexual images… already have cinema-style age ratings? In fact, didn’t the report suggest that all games have the same age ratings used for films on the front of the box, merely extending the system as it is right now? I’m reminded of that The One Show report already.

Explaining a bit more about the report, it goes on to say how “these games are played by hundreds of thousands of youngsters” (because as we know, only pesky kids play games, when instead they should all be sitting around reading copies of the Daily Mail, that’s better for their mental health), and explains the existing age rating systems (though conveniently forgetting their opening sentence said that these cinema-style ratings are only things that “will” be introduced). Following that is a picture of two children playing Mario Kart on the N64, with the caption: “Harmful: A Government-commissioned report says that video games can desensitise children to violence” – and now, again, I’ve only actually read the report, but didn’t it say that previous studies have only shown short-term increases in aggression (nothing long-term has been proven) and that evidence shows a correlation, not causation? Oh wait, yes it did. But that’s smart for the Daily Mail to print! Why, they need to tell us that Diana was killed by Polish people who were taking advantage of the NHS!

Diamond goes on to review various games, telling us how games are “mindless garbage”, how all games are violent (though if you read the report dearie you’d have seen a lovely graph showing how games rated 15 and 18 are actually in the minority), and that Resident Evil 4 “shouldn’t be allowed to be sold, even to adults”.

This is a grade A piece of sensationalist spin. What sort of shitty journalism is it to prove games are bad for kids by buying games that are rated to not be for kids? In fact, why again are games getting singled out? Many of the games played were rated by the BBFC: I’m seeing no report from the Mail about how 18 rated films “are to carry age ratings” followed by reviews of horror movies leading you to believe all movies should be banned, there’s no review of Farmyard Frolics 3 calling it the “most disgusting thing to ever come out of Wales, and I’ll never look at a sheep in the same way again?”. Those examples might seem over the top, but it’s exactly what happened here.
You should not look at the more adult material in a particular medium, use that to discredit the entire medium and review it to say it’s inappropriate for kids, whilst getting your facts wrong about the rating system. I’d be disappointed, but it’s the Daily Mail, and I had bets on one newspaper doing something like this after Byron.

Remember, each time you believe what you read in the Daily Mail, you lose a brain cell.

This entry was posted in Opinion. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

8 Comments Comment RSS

  1. midnightz
    Posted March 28, 2008 at 1:28 pm | Permalink

    What on earth were you doing reading the Daily Mail?! I can only suspect it was whilst you were in the toilet and waiting to use it to wipe your bum…

  2. Jonathan Cresswell
    Posted March 28, 2008 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    In my defence, someone else saw it, posted it on a forum, and then I read it.

    My paper of choice is the Guardian, which I read on Mondays due to the MediaGuardian bit and Thursdays due to TechnologyGuardian. I like supplements.

  3. Posted March 28, 2008 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

    Sky News also run a very similar take on the news. Saying that games would get BBFC ratings… Even though games have been carrying them since as long as I can remember. (I have a bleeding original Doom: Thy Flesh Consumed box with a BBFC 15+ rating on the front of it.)

    The BBC aren’t much better, they’re so incredibly bias against video games you can actually feel the hate when reading website articles or listen to headlines on BBC News 24.
    Reading their response to the report on BBC.co.uk yesterday made me roll my eyes. However, I think they did learn from past mistakes (Sony Vs. Church, anyone?) and actually got people from the video game industry to talk about the report on BBC News 24, people from EA and somewhere else where they were speaking sense.

  4. Aero
    Posted March 28, 2008 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    I’ve taken the liberty of correcting your last sentence.
    “Remember, each time read the Daily Mail, you lose a brain cell.”

  5. Jonathan Cresswell
    Posted March 28, 2008 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    The thing is, I keep using the BBC complaints form and as they have a proper official process they have to be listened to, so they’re certainly improving. What was interesting is how on the dot.life tech blog they do, they covered what Byron actually said much better than their news articles: it’s the only place I’ve actually seen someone apart from me point out that she said BBFC on the front and PEGI on the back.

    Anyway, I best get back on set, filming Newswire…

  6. Dave
    Posted March 28, 2008 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    Ratings on games? You chose to write an article on that?! There are illegal immigrant paedophile terrorists stealing our jobs and we’re all going to die and you focus on video games?! You should be panicking, dammit!

  7. Posted March 28, 2008 at 6:05 pm | Permalink

    The sad truth is that a lot of people take in what the Daily Mail says as truth.

  8. Johnny
    Posted January 11, 2010 at 1:46 am | Permalink

    The Daily Mail are about as convincing as Robert Mugabe’s press officers. I mean, when British sailors were captured a few years ago, the Mail said that the Aussies earlier on reacted by getting in a Mexican standoff and telling the Iranians to f**k off (obviously the Aussies were brave, but they could’ve started a massacre), and every Southerner, Essex boy and ex-pat Brit from Benidorm to Sydney began going “good on you aussies, not like us rubbish lot, the Navy are a disgrace, the Aussies didn’t cry like babies and surrender”. No doubt that those who were spewing such nancyboy armchair gobshitery would’ve been hysterical as soon as the Iranians shoved their gun muzzles in their faces (something that the Royal Navy, I am certain didn’t do).

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*